| 1 | Mold design capability | Review the proposed cavity layout, parting line, gate location, venting, ejection method, and cooling-channel plan. Confirm that the design accounts for the handle geometry and any required overmolding. | Ask for a design-for-manufacturing review, 2D drawings, 3D mold design, and a documented review of potential molding risks. | Design choices affect filling, cooling, part appearance, cycle time, and the risk of defects such as short shots or warpage. |
| 2 | Mold steel and components | Compare the specified mold steel, hardness, corrosion resistance, and replaceable wear components against the intended resin, production volume, and maintenance conditions. | Request steel grade documentation, heat-treatment records where applicable, component specifications, and a maintenance plan. | There is no single best steel for every mold. Material selection should reflect expected production, resin characteristics, and operating environment. |
| 3 | Resin and process compatibility | Confirm that the design supports the intended handle material, such as polypropylene or another specified thermoplastic. For multi-material designs, review compatibility and the proposed molding sequence. | Ask the supplier to document the resin assumptions, shrinkage data source, processing window, and any material-interface testing plan. | Resin selection and processing conditions influence shrinkage, fit, appearance, and bonding between materials. Material data should be verified for the actual grade selected. |
| 4 | Cavity count and production capacity | Compare the number of cavities, expected cycle time, machine requirements, and planned production capacity. Check that the proposed layout allows consistent filling and cooling across cavities. | Request a written capacity estimate with its assumptions, a machine compatibility check, and sample-part results from all cavities during the mold trial. | A higher cavity count can increase output, but it also requires appropriate machine capacity and balanced process control. |
| 5 | Dimensional control and validation | Agree on critical dimensions, tolerances, appearance criteria, and sampling requirements before tooling begins. Consider applicable guidance such as ISO 20457 for tolerances and acceptance conditions for plastic moulded parts. | Request a dimensional inspection report, measurement method, cavity identification, trial records, and a first-article approval process. | Acceptance limits should be defined on the product drawing or specification; tolerances are not automatically the same for every toothbrush design. |
| 6 | Quality system and traceability | Evaluate how the supplier controls design changes, incoming materials, production records, nonconforming work, and corrective actions. Check whether an ISO 9001-certified quality management system is relevant to your requirements. | Ask for current certification details if claimed, sample inspection records, change-control procedures, and traceability practices for mold components and trial parts. | A quality management system can support consistent processes, but certification alone does not prove that a specific mold or part will meet your requirements. |
| 7 | Trials, maintenance, and support | Compare the mold-trial plan, acceptance criteria, spare-parts availability, preventive maintenance guidance, repair response, and ownership terms for mold drawings and tooling. | Request a trial schedule, sample approval procedure, maintenance checklist, warranty terms, and a clear list of deliverables at handover. | Documented trials and after-delivery support help identify issues early and keep the mold maintainable throughout its service life. |